Looking at Buddhism – Has it Failed in Asia?
To ask such a question is controversial and liable to
bring about various responses.
Some people who think of themselves and call
themselves a “Buddhist” may react with anger or
resentment to such a question.
Those who might think that Asian and Buddhist
countries and cultures are lands of enlightenment
might be disappointed or feel some anger or resentment
also.
But just by asking such a question we do not imply
that Buddhism has failed in Asia.
How can anyone accurately answer such a thing? We can
only perceive and analyze and understand that our
analysis may be flawed in some way or wrong.
And we always want to remember that we are flawed
already and that it is through Buddhism that we are
trying to become more focused and mindful.
Some insight into answering this question may be
derived from an interview with a well-respected
Buddhist monk from Tibet that I listened to some years
back.
During the course of the interview two interesting and important points were made that may shed some light
on this question.
One was that the interviewer made the point that
Buddhism came into different cultures and was able to
“merge’ with the culture and the Tibetan Buddhist monk
made the point that not all of the people in Tibet
were enlightened people.
As regards the first point, it seems that in some
respects Buddhism may have been weakened or
compromised in some manner by the forces at work in
the countries and cultures it came into.
It is sad to see that so many of the lay Buddhists in
Thailand do not trust or respect the monks anymore and
that many see the making of merit (the offering of
alms) as a way to get those things that they want,
kind of similar to asking Jesus or God to give us what
we want, instead of making an effort to understand and
apply the teachings of Jesus or the Buddha.
In addition, in Thailand there are widespread problems
with corruption, drug and drink abuse, prostitution,
gambling and domestic violence and violence and
murders relating to love and business.
From these ongoing states of affair it is hard to see
how Buddhism has made any impact on the actions of the
people here.
And this relates to the second point that was made in
the interview.
Because a country has a lot of temples, or a large
population of monks, or takes Buddhism as its religion
does not mean that many or most of the people
understand what these things really mean and tries to
learn and apply them.
Buddhism is there but there are forces in the society
that work against its understanding and practice.
But then again, if more people were practicing
Buddhism, perhaps there would not be so much economic
growth and new buildings going up here and there.
The forces that drive people in Asia, just as
elsewhere in the world are not Buddhism and its
practices but instead individual desires and greed.
In addition to this, the forces of nationalism and
xenophobia are much more powerful in Asia then
Buddhism is.
Since countries are very clearly built around one
ethnic group, people tend to see themselves as a group
with defined needs and goals and seldom look at
members of other ethnic groups or other countries in
the compassionate light of the Buddhist teachings.
So we have Thai Buddhists who hate and look down on
Cambodian Buddhists and vice a versa and the same
holds true for the Burmese and the Thai.
This type of situation may be truer in Southeast Asia
where we have three countries (Cambodia, Thailand,
Burma) that have a history based on wars and conflicts
between them then in other parts of Asia.
Of course, the history of Asia, just like other parts
of the world is one of fighting, wars and internal
conflicts, all based more on the desire for wealth,
power and influence then on gentleness and compassion.
There have been internal conflicts in and conflicts
between Japan, Korea and China, all countries that
have an historical affiliation with Buddhism and many
monks, temples and organizations devoted to Buddhism
in these modern times.
If these countries and cultures are not able to bring
Buddhism into the minds and actions of their people,
we will most likely continue to see the same problems
in the future, both within the countries and between
them, as people get lost in the material world and
suffer because of the greed and ignorance of those who
have more power and influence then them.
And what they will strive for will not be the wisdom
and compassion of the Buddha but instead the things
that they see in those who exploit and oppress them in
the present.
Perhaps the way it is going and will continue to go
will at sometime in the future give us a clearer
answer to this question.
©2004 John C. Kimbrough
(John lives and teaches in Bangkok, Thailand. He can
be reached at johnckimbrough@yahoo.com)